Cathie Wood's five-year return hurdle calculator
Calculate the CAGR needed to reach a five-year target and compare it with ARK's stated 15%-annual security-selection hurdle.
Cathie Wood Historical strategy from 2024 Rule located in ARK Invest Europe, 2024 Portrait: Caroline Wood, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Self-hosted by JMM.
Put your numbers through the rule
The source establishes the rule. The values below belong to you, and the output is JMM's deterministic calculation.
Every field recalculates immediately. Changed values can be copied into a shareable URL.
- 15% hurdle path
- $21,072
- 8% comparison path
- $14,898
- Gap from 15% hurdle
- 0.9%
The 15% line is ARK’s stated selection hurdle, not a forecast or guaranteed outcome.
Required path
- Annual return
- 15.9%
- Ending value
- $22,000
ARK hurdle path
- Annual return
- 15.0%
- Ending value
- $21,072
What the source says, and what the calculator adds
What changes the answer
A hurdle is not an outcome
Expected return is an input to security selection. The target calculation shows how demanding the hurdle is without asserting it will occur.
Time horizon changes the required rate
The same target becomes much more or less demanding as the horizon changes, which is why the period stays attached to every result.
A 15% selection hurdle is a filter on what ARK buys, not a return anyone is owed.
Read the wording carefully and the claim is modest: ARK says it tries to pick companies it expects to compound at 15% or better over five years. Every active manager applies some version of that filter, and stating the number is more transparent than most. The trouble is what happens to it in public. A selection hurdle gets repeated as a fund return, and the two are not related — a manager can apply a 15% filter perfectly and still lose money, because the hurdle screens candidates and says nothing about position sizing, timing, or the price paid. JMM’s read: useful as a statement of style, worthless as a forecast, and dangerous the moment someone compounds it forward in a spreadsheet.
Not the calculator’s limits. The rule’s.
An expected return is an input, not a result
The hurdle describes what has to be true for a company to enter the portfolio. Whether it turns out to be true is a separate question the hurdle cannot answer and does not claim to.
The hurdle has no price discipline attached
A company can clear a 15% growth expectation and still be a poor investment at the price paid for it. Nothing in the stated rule connects the expected growth to the valuation.
What this model does not know
- The 15% figure is a security-selection hurdle, not a promised fund or portfolio return.
- Contributions make a single closed-form CAGR unavailable; the model solves it iteratively.
- Volatility, loss, fees, taxes, and valuation are excluded.
Before you use the result
Does ARK guarantee 15% a year?
No. The cited source describes a security-selection hurdle.
Why can the required CAGR differ from the return scenario?
One solves the rate needed for your target; the other projects the result of a rate you choose.
The next question this page cannot answer
- Calculator CAGR calculator
The same compounding without the thesis attached, for checking a hurdle rate against any starting and ending value.
Open → - Guide Six ways a backtest lies, and the habit that catches them
Why a five-year forward hurdle validated against a chosen past window is the easiest number in finance to make look reasonable.
Open → - Cathie Wood, sourced rule Wright's Law cost curve
The cost-decline engine the hurdle depends on, run as its own model rather than assumed.
Open →
Keep researching Cathie Wood
Open the verified role and source record behind this historical strategy.
General calculatorRun the underlying math without the source contextUse the reusable JMM tool with your own assumptions.
Another Cathie Wood ruleDisruptive innovation exposure mapHow concentrated is your five-platform innovation map?